Based on 1 and 563 real audits
| Metric | Lemon Squeezy | Swiper | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 56 | 38 | Lemon Squeezy |
| Accessibility | 100 | 86 | Lemon Squeezy |
| Best Practices | 96 | 87 | Lemon Squeezy |
| SEO | 83 | 90 | Swiper |
| Security | 59 | 67 | Swiper |
| TTFB | 242ms | 474ms | Lemon Squeezy |
| Composite | 72 | 73 | Swiper |
Lemon Squeezy outperforms Swiper in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 73). Swiper leads in SEO, security, composite score.
Choose Lemon Squeezy when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Swiper when your primary concern is security and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Lemon Squeezy sites and 563 audited Swiper sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback