Skip to content

Level Access vs New Relic

Based on 4 and 177 real audits

View Level Access details | View New Relic details
MetricLevel AccessNew RelicWinner
Performance3835Level Access
Accessibility8989Tie
Best Practices8485New Relic
SEO9490Level Access
Security6365New Relic
TTFB205ms236msLevel Access
Composite7272Tie
Performance
Level Access
38
New Relic
35
Accessibility
Level Access
89
New Relic
89
Security
Level Access
63
New Relic
65
SEO
Level Access
94
New Relic
90
Composite
Level Access
72
New Relic
72

Level Access outperforms New Relic in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 72). New Relic leads in best practices, security.

When to choose Level Access

Choose Level Access when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose New Relic

Choose New Relic when your primary concern is security and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 4 audited Level Access sites and 177 audited New Relic sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Level Access or New Relic?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Level Access sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (38 vs 35 on average).
Which has better security, Level Access or New Relic?
New Relic sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 63 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Level Access or New Relic?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Level Access (89 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Level Access or New Relic?
Level Access sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (94 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Level Access or New Relic?
Level Access sites show lower Time to First Byte (205 ms vs 236 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Level Access or New Relic for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Level Access scores higher on overall composite score while Level Access may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback