| Metric | Liferay | React | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 45 | 38 | Liferay |
| Accessibility | 92 | 89 | Liferay |
| Best Practices | 91 | 87 | Liferay |
| SEO | 92 | 93 | React |
| Security | 64 | 67 | React |
| TTFB | 334ms | 332ms | React |
| Composite | 73 | 74 | React |
React outperforms Liferay in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Liferay leads in performance, accessibility, best practices.
Choose Liferay when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose React when your primary concern is security and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 7 audited Liferay sites and 1021 audited React sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback