Based on 26 and 4433 real audits
| Metric | Linkedin Ads | Open Graph | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 35 | 49 | Open Graph |
| Accessibility | 92 | 89 | Linkedin Ads |
| Best Practices | 88 | 88 | Tie |
| SEO | 93 | 93 | Tie |
| Security | 71 | 70 | Linkedin Ads |
| TTFB | 440ms | 430ms | Open Graph |
| Composite | 75 | 77 | Open Graph |
Open Graph outperforms Linkedin Ads in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 75). Linkedin Ads leads in accessibility, security.
Choose Linkedin Ads when your primary concern is accessibility and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is performance and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 26 audited Linkedin Ads sites and 4433 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback