Skip to content

Linkedin Ads vs Open Graph

Based on 26 and 3415 real audits

View Linkedin Ads details | View Open Graph details
MetricLinkedin AdsOpen GraphWinner
Performance3545Open Graph
Accessibility9289Linkedin Ads
Best Practices8887Linkedin Ads
SEO9392Linkedin Ads
Security7166Linkedin Ads
TTFB440ms365msOpen Graph
Composite7574Linkedin Ads
Performance
Linkedin Ads
35
Open Graph
45
Accessibility
Linkedin Ads
92
Open Graph
89
Security
Linkedin Ads
71
Open Graph
66
SEO
Linkedin Ads
93
Open Graph
92
Composite
Linkedin Ads
75
Open Graph
74

Linkedin Ads outperforms Open Graph in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 74). Open Graph leads in performance, TTFB.

When to choose Linkedin Ads

Choose Linkedin Ads when your primary concern is security and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Open Graph

Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 26 audited Linkedin Ads sites and 3415 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Linkedin Ads or Open Graph?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Open Graph sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (45 vs 35 on average).
Which has better security, Linkedin Ads or Open Graph?
Linkedin Ads sites score higher on security analysis (71 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Linkedin Ads or Open Graph?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Linkedin Ads (92 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Linkedin Ads or Open Graph?
Linkedin Ads sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Linkedin Ads or Open Graph?
Open Graph sites show lower Time to First Byte (365 ms vs 440 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Linkedin Ads or Open Graph for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Open Graph scores higher on overall composite score while Linkedin Ads may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback