| Metric | Linkedin Ads | React | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 35 | 38 | React |
| Accessibility | 92 | 89 | Linkedin Ads |
| Best Practices | 88 | 87 | Linkedin Ads |
| SEO | 93 | 93 | Tie |
| Security | 71 | 67 | Linkedin Ads |
| TTFB | 440ms | 332ms | React |
| Composite | 75 | 74 | Linkedin Ads |
Linkedin Ads outperforms React in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 74). React leads in performance, TTFB.
Choose Linkedin Ads when your primary concern is security and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose React when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 26 audited Linkedin Ads sites and 1021 audited React sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback