Based on 259 and 2 real audits
| Metric | Linkedin Insight Tag | Peerius | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 33 | 51 | Peerius |
| Accessibility | 90 | 84 | Linkedin Insight Tag |
| Best Practices | 79 | 84 | Peerius |
| SEO | 90 | 85 | Linkedin Insight Tag |
| Security | 66 | 63 | Linkedin Insight Tag |
| TTFB | 366ms | 666ms | Linkedin Insight Tag |
| Composite | 73 | 71 | Linkedin Insight Tag |
Linkedin Insight Tag outperforms Peerius in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 71). Peerius leads in performance, best practices.
Choose Linkedin Insight Tag when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Peerius when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 259 audited Linkedin Insight Tag sites and 2 audited Peerius sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback