Skip to content

Linkedin Sign-in vs Open Graph

Based on 1 and 344 real audits

View Linkedin Sign-in details | View Open Graph details
MetricLinkedin Sign-inOpen GraphWinner
Performance6546Linkedin Sign-in
Accessibility10090Linkedin Sign-in
Best Practices9690Linkedin Sign-in
SEO10093Linkedin Sign-in
Security7165Linkedin Sign-in
TTFB279ms325msLinkedin Sign-in
Composite7975Linkedin Sign-in
Performance
Linkedin Sign-in
65
Open Graph
46
Accessibility
Linkedin Sign-in
100
Open Graph
90
Security
Linkedin Sign-in
71
Open Graph
65
SEO
Linkedin Sign-in
100
Open Graph
93
Composite
Linkedin Sign-in
79
Open Graph
75

Linkedin Sign-in outperforms Open Graph in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (79 vs 75). Open Graph leads in no categories.

FAQ

Which is faster, Linkedin Sign-in or Open Graph?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Linkedin Sign-in sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (65 vs 46 on average).
Which has better security, Linkedin Sign-in or Open Graph?
Linkedin Sign-in sites score higher on security analysis (71 vs 65 on average).
Should I choose Linkedin Sign-in or Open Graph for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Linkedin Sign-in scores higher on performance while Linkedin Sign-in may excel in other areas. Run a free BeaverCheck audit to compare specific metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback