Based on 14 and 1818 real audits
| Metric | List.js | Tailwind CSS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 48 | 53 | Tailwind CSS |
| Accessibility | 80 | 90 | Tailwind CSS |
| Best Practices | 91 | 90 | List.js |
| SEO | 86 | 93 | Tailwind CSS |
| Security | 66 | 72 | Tailwind CSS |
| TTFB | 468ms | 463ms | Tailwind CSS |
| Composite | 74 | 78 | Tailwind CSS |
Tailwind CSS outperforms List.js in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 74). List.js leads in best practices.
Choose List.js when your primary concern is best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Tailwind CSS when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 14 audited List.js sites and 1818 audited Tailwind CSS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback