Based on 2 and 136 real audits
| Metric | Listrak | Matomo Analytics | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 25 | 52 | Matomo Analytics |
| Accessibility | 86 | 88 | Matomo Analytics |
| Best Practices | 84 | 89 | Matomo Analytics |
| SEO | 80 | 90 | Matomo Analytics |
| Security | 65 | 65 | Tie |
| TTFB | 759ms | 428ms | Matomo Analytics |
| Composite | 70 | 74 | Matomo Analytics |
Matomo Analytics outperforms Listrak in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 70). Listrak leads in no categories.
Listrak doesn't clearly lead Matomo Analytics in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Matomo Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2 audited Listrak sites and 136 audited Matomo Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback