Skip to content

Litespeed Cache vs MySQL

Based on 2 and 20 real audits

View Litespeed Cache details | View MySQL details
MetricLitespeed CacheMySQLWinner
Performance6151Litespeed Cache
Accessibility9391Litespeed Cache
Best Practices9689Litespeed Cache
SEO6991MySQL
Security6265MySQL
TTFB572ms173msMySQL
Composite7275MySQL
Performance
Litespeed Cache
61
MySQL
51
Accessibility
Litespeed Cache
93
MySQL
91
Security
Litespeed Cache
62
MySQL
65
SEO
Litespeed Cache
69
MySQL
91
Composite
Litespeed Cache
72
MySQL
75

MySQL outperforms Litespeed Cache in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 72). Litespeed Cache leads in performance, accessibility, best practices.

FAQ

Which is faster, Litespeed Cache or MySQL?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Litespeed Cache sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (61 vs 51 on average).
Which has better security, Litespeed Cache or MySQL?
MySQL sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 62 on average).
Should I choose Litespeed Cache or MySQL for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Litespeed Cache scores higher on performance while Litespeed Cache may excel in other areas. Run a free BeaverCheck audit to compare specific metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback