Skip to content

Litespeed Cache vs PHP

Based on 34 and 1061 real audits

View Litespeed Cache details | View PHP details
MetricLitespeed CachePHPWinner
Performance5647Litespeed Cache
Accessibility9089Litespeed Cache
Best Practices9088Litespeed Cache
SEO9291Litespeed Cache
Security7366Litespeed Cache
TTFB1285ms430msPHP
Composite8074Litespeed Cache
Performance
Litespeed Cache
56
PHP
47
Accessibility
Litespeed Cache
90
PHP
89
Security
Litespeed Cache
73
PHP
66
SEO
Litespeed Cache
92
PHP
91
Composite
Litespeed Cache
80
PHP
74

Litespeed Cache outperforms PHP in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (80 vs 74). PHP leads in TTFB.

When to choose Litespeed Cache

Choose Litespeed Cache when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose PHP

Choose PHP when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 34 audited Litespeed Cache sites and 1061 audited PHP sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Litespeed Cache or PHP?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Litespeed Cache sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (56 vs 47 on average).
Which has better security, Litespeed Cache or PHP?
Litespeed Cache sites score higher on security analysis (73 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Litespeed Cache or PHP?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Litespeed Cache (90 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Litespeed Cache or PHP?
Litespeed Cache sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Litespeed Cache or PHP?
PHP sites show lower Time to First Byte (430 ms vs 1285 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Litespeed Cache or PHP for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Litespeed Cache scores higher on overall composite score while Litespeed Cache may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback