Skip to content

Lucide vs Paraglide JS

Based on 117 and 12 real audits

View Lucide details | View Paraglide JS details
MetricLucideParaglide JSWinner
Performance5566Paraglide JS
Accessibility9195Paraglide JS
Best Practices9195Paraglide JS
SEO9598Paraglide JS
Security7584Paraglide JS
TTFB405ms255msParaglide JS
Composite8085Paraglide JS
Performance
Lucide
55
Paraglide JS
66
Accessibility
Lucide
91
Paraglide JS
95
Security
Lucide
75
Paraglide JS
84
SEO
Lucide
95
Paraglide JS
98
Composite
Lucide
80
Paraglide JS
85

Paraglide JS outperforms Lucide in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (85 vs 80). Lucide leads in no categories.

When to choose Lucide

Lucide doesn't clearly lead Paraglide JS in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

When to choose Paraglide JS

Choose Paraglide JS when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 117 audited Lucide sites and 12 audited Paraglide JS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Lucide or Paraglide JS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Paraglide JS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (66 vs 55 on average).
Which has better security, Lucide or Paraglide JS?
Paraglide JS sites score higher on security analysis (84 vs 75 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Lucide or Paraglide JS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Paraglide JS (95 vs 91). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Lucide or Paraglide JS?
Paraglide JS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (98 vs 95 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Lucide or Paraglide JS?
Paraglide JS sites show lower Time to First Byte (255 ms vs 405 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Lucide or Paraglide JS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Paraglide JS scores higher on overall composite score while Lucide may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback