Based on 76 and 1337 real audits
| Metric | Lucide | Tailwind CSS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 48 | 48 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 89 | 90 | Tailwind CSS |
| Best Practices | 88 | 88 | Tie |
| SEO | 94 | 92 | Lucide |
| Security | 70 | 68 | Lucide |
| TTFB | 319ms | 378ms | Lucide |
| Composite | 77 | 75 | Lucide |
Lucide outperforms Tailwind CSS in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 75). Tailwind CSS leads in accessibility.
Choose Lucide when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Tailwind CSS when your primary concern is accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 76 audited Lucide sites and 1337 audited Tailwind CSS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback