Based on 70 and 1304 real audits
| Metric | Lucide | Tailwind CSS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 47 | 48 | Tailwind CSS |
| Accessibility | 89 | 90 | Tailwind CSS |
| Best Practices | 88 | 88 | Tie |
| SEO | 93 | 92 | Lucide |
| Security | 69 | 67 | Lucide |
| TTFB | 311ms | 375ms | Lucide |
| Composite | 76 | 75 | Lucide |
Lucide outperforms Tailwind CSS in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 75). Tailwind CSS leads in performance, accessibility.
Choose Lucide when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Tailwind CSS when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 70 audited Lucide sites and 1304 audited Tailwind CSS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback