Skip to content

Lucide vs Umami

Based on 117 and 21 real audits

View Lucide details | View Umami details
MetricLucideUmamiWinner
Performance5569Umami
Accessibility9192Umami
Best Practices9195Umami
SEO9595Tie
Security7574Lucide
TTFB405ms299msUmami
Composite8080Tie
Performance
Lucide
55
Umami
69
Accessibility
Lucide
91
Umami
92
Security
Lucide
75
Umami
74
SEO
Lucide
95
Umami
95
Composite
Lucide
80
Umami
80

Umami outperforms Lucide in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (80 vs 80). Lucide leads in security.

When to choose Lucide

Choose Lucide when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Umami

Choose Umami when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 117 audited Lucide sites and 21 audited Umami sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Lucide or Umami?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Umami sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (69 vs 55 on average).
Which has better security, Lucide or Umami?
Lucide sites score higher on security analysis (75 vs 74 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Lucide or Umami?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Umami (92 vs 91). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Lucide or Umami?
Lucide sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (95 vs 95 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Lucide or Umami?
Umami sites show lower Time to First Byte (299 ms vs 405 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Lucide or Umami for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Umami scores higher on overall composite score while Lucide may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback