Skip to content

Lucide vs Umami

Based on 300 and 42 real audits

View Lucide details | View Umami details
MetricLucideUmamiWinner
Performance6568Umami
Accessibility9393Tie
Best Practices9596Umami
SEO9596Umami
Security8278Lucide
TTFB677ms476msUmami
Composite8483Lucide
Performance
Lucide
65
Umami
68
Accessibility
Lucide
93
Umami
93
Security
Lucide
82
Umami
78
SEO
Lucide
95
Umami
96
Composite
Lucide
84
Umami
83

Umami outperforms Lucide in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (83 vs 84). Lucide leads in security, composite score.

When to choose Lucide

Choose Lucide when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Umami

Choose Umami when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 300 audited Lucide sites and 42 audited Umami sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Lucide or Umami?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Umami sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (68 vs 65 on average).
Which has better security, Lucide or Umami?
Lucide sites score higher on security analysis (82 vs 78 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Lucide or Umami?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Lucide (93 vs 93). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Lucide or Umami?
Umami sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (96 vs 95 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Lucide or Umami?
Umami sites show lower Time to First Byte (476 ms vs 677 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Lucide or Umami for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Umami scores higher on overall composite score while Lucide may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback