Based on 3 and 3888 real audits
| Metric | Lucky Orange | Open Graph | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 33 | 48 | Open Graph |
| Accessibility | 86 | 89 | Open Graph |
| Best Practices | 72 | 88 | Open Graph |
| SEO | 89 | 92 | Open Graph |
| Security | 77 | 68 | Lucky Orange |
| TTFB | 214ms | 386ms | Lucky Orange |
| Composite | 76 | 76 | Tie |
Open Graph outperforms Lucky Orange in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 76). Lucky Orange leads in security, TTFB.
Choose Lucky Orange when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3 audited Lucky Orange sites and 3888 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback