Based on 2 and 3463 real audits
| Metric | Lucky Orange | Open Graph | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 38 | 45 | Open Graph |
| Accessibility | 90 | 89 | Lucky Orange |
| Best Practices | 77 | 87 | Open Graph |
| SEO | 96 | 92 | Lucky Orange |
| Security | 76 | 67 | Lucky Orange |
| TTFB | 302ms | 368ms | Lucky Orange |
| Composite | 76 | 74 | Lucky Orange |
Lucky Orange outperforms Open Graph in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 74). Open Graph leads in performance, best practices.
Choose Lucky Orange when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2 audited Lucky Orange sites and 3463 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback