Based on 35 and 5 real audits
| Metric | MailChimp | MailChimp for WordPress | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 46 | 42 | MailChimp |
| Accessibility | 85 | 83 | MailChimp |
| Best Practices | 88 | 93 | MailChimp for WordPress |
| SEO | 90 | 87 | MailChimp |
| Security | 67 | 68 | MailChimp for WordPress |
| TTFB | 311ms | 435ms | MailChimp |
| Composite | 74 | 75 | MailChimp for WordPress |
MailChimp outperforms MailChimp for WordPress in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 75). MailChimp for WordPress leads in best practices, security, composite score.
Choose MailChimp when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose MailChimp for WordPress when your primary concern is best practices and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 35 audited MailChimp sites and 5 audited MailChimp for WordPress sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback