| Metric | MailChimp | RSS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 49 | 50 | RSS |
| Accessibility | 85 | 88 | RSS |
| Best Practices | 88 | 90 | RSS |
| SEO | 90 | 92 | RSS |
| Security | 70 | 70 | Tie |
| TTFB | 791ms | 591ms | RSS |
| Composite | 76 | 77 | RSS |
RSS outperforms MailChimp in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 76). MailChimp leads in no categories.
MailChimp doesn't clearly lead RSS in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose RSS when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 52 audited MailChimp sites and 1237 audited RSS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback