| Metric | Mantine | Webpack | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 42 | 38 | Mantine |
| Accessibility | 76 | 89 | Webpack |
| Best Practices | 83 | 87 | Webpack |
| SEO | 95 | 92 | Mantine |
| Security | 70 | 66 | Mantine |
| TTFB | 264ms | 305ms | Mantine |
| Composite | 76 | 73 | Mantine |
Mantine outperforms Webpack in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 73). Webpack leads in accessibility, best practices.
Choose Mantine when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Webpack when your primary concern is accessibility and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3 audited Mantine sites and 956 audited Webpack sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback