Skip to content

MapLibre GL JS vs Matomo Analytics

Based on 1 and 136 real audits

View MapLibre GL JS details | View Matomo Analytics details
MetricMapLibre GL JSMatomo AnalyticsWinner
Performance6452MapLibre GL JS
Accessibility9688MapLibre GL JS
Best Practices9689MapLibre GL JS
SEO9290MapLibre GL JS
Security6865MapLibre GL JS
TTFB19ms428msMapLibre GL JS
Composite7674MapLibre GL JS
Performance
MapLibre GL JS
64
Matomo Analytics
52
Accessibility
MapLibre GL JS
96
Matomo Analytics
88
Security
MapLibre GL JS
68
Matomo Analytics
65
SEO
MapLibre GL JS
92
Matomo Analytics
90
Composite
MapLibre GL JS
76
Matomo Analytics
74

MapLibre GL JS outperforms Matomo Analytics in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 74). Matomo Analytics leads in no categories.

When to choose MapLibre GL JS

Choose MapLibre GL JS when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Matomo Analytics

Matomo Analytics doesn't clearly lead MapLibre GL JS in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1 audited MapLibre GL JS sites and 136 audited Matomo Analytics sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, MapLibre GL JS or Matomo Analytics?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, MapLibre GL JS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (64 vs 52 on average).
Which has better security, MapLibre GL JS or Matomo Analytics?
MapLibre GL JS sites score higher on security analysis (68 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, MapLibre GL JS or Matomo Analytics?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor MapLibre GL JS (96 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, MapLibre GL JS or Matomo Analytics?
MapLibre GL JS sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), MapLibre GL JS or Matomo Analytics?
MapLibre GL JS sites show lower Time to First Byte (19 ms vs 428 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose MapLibre GL JS or Matomo Analytics for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. MapLibre GL JS scores higher on overall composite score while MapLibre GL JS may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback