Skip to content

Masonry vs PHP

Based on 115 and 1104 real audits

View Masonry details | View PHP details
MetricMasonryPHPWinner
Performance4747Tie
Accessibility8489PHP
Best Practices8888Tie
SEO9091PHP
Security6566PHP
TTFB532ms458msPHP
Composite7475PHP
Performance
Masonry
47
PHP
47
Accessibility
Masonry
84
PHP
89
Security
Masonry
65
PHP
66
SEO
Masonry
90
PHP
91
Composite
Masonry
74
PHP
75

PHP outperforms Masonry in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 74). Masonry leads in no categories.

When to choose Masonry

Masonry doesn't clearly lead PHP in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

When to choose PHP

Choose PHP when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 115 audited Masonry sites and 1104 audited PHP sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Masonry or PHP?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Masonry sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (47 vs 47 on average).
Which has better security, Masonry or PHP?
PHP sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Masonry or PHP?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor PHP (89 vs 84). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Masonry or PHP?
PHP sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Masonry or PHP?
PHP sites show lower Time to First Byte (458 ms vs 532 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Masonry or PHP for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Masonry scores higher on overall composite score while Masonry may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback