Skip to content

Masonry vs PHP

Based on 128 and 1250 real audits

View Masonry details | View PHP details
MetricMasonryPHPWinner
Performance4649PHP
Accessibility8488PHP
Best Practices8888Tie
SEO9091PHP
Security6768PHP
TTFB590ms510msPHP
Composite7575Tie
Performance
Masonry
46
PHP
49
Accessibility
Masonry
84
PHP
88
Security
Masonry
67
PHP
68
SEO
Masonry
90
PHP
91
Composite
Masonry
75
PHP
75

PHP outperforms Masonry in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 75). Masonry leads in no categories.

When to choose Masonry

Masonry doesn't clearly lead PHP in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

When to choose PHP

Choose PHP when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 128 audited Masonry sites and 1250 audited PHP sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Masonry or PHP?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, PHP sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (49 vs 46 on average).
Which has better security, Masonry or PHP?
PHP sites score higher on security analysis (68 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Masonry or PHP?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor PHP (88 vs 84). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Masonry or PHP?
PHP sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Masonry or PHP?
PHP sites show lower Time to First Byte (510 ms vs 590 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Masonry or PHP for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. PHP scores higher on overall composite score while Masonry may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback