| Metric | Mastodon | Varnish | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 51 | 44 | Mastodon |
| Accessibility | 91 | 89 | Mastodon |
| Best Practices | 100 | 88 | Mastodon |
| SEO | 100 | 92 | Mastodon |
| Security | 84 | 65 | Mastodon |
| TTFB | 207ms | 209ms | Mastodon |
| Composite | 78 | 73 | Mastodon |
Mastodon outperforms Varnish in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 73). Varnish leads in no categories.
Choose Mastodon when your primary concern is security and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Varnish doesn't clearly lead Mastodon in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Mastodon sites and 420 audited Varnish sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback