Skip to content

Material UI vs MUI

Based on 25 and 22 real audits

View Material UI details | View MUI details
MetricMaterial UIMUIWinner
Performance3535Tie
Accessibility9190Material UI
Best Practices8889MUI
SEO8888Tie
Security6667MUI
TTFB374ms402msMaterial UI
Composite7474Tie
Performance
Material UI
35
MUI
35
Accessibility
Material UI
91
MUI
90
Security
Material UI
66
MUI
67
SEO
Material UI
88
MUI
88
Composite
Material UI
74
MUI
74

Material UI and MUI are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Material UI has a composite score of 74 while MUI scores 74.

When to choose Material UI

Choose Material UI when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose MUI

Choose MUI when your primary concern is best practices and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 25 audited Material UI sites and 22 audited MUI sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Material UI or MUI?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Material UI sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (35 vs 35 on average).
Which has better security, Material UI or MUI?
MUI sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Material UI or MUI?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Material UI (91 vs 90). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Material UI or MUI?
Material UI sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (88 vs 88 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Material UI or MUI?
Material UI sites show lower Time to First Byte (374 ms vs 402 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Material UI or MUI for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Material UI scores higher on overall composite score while Material UI may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback