Skip to content

Material UI vs Next.js

Based on 25 and 627 real audits

View Material UI details | View Next.js details
MetricMaterial UINext.jsWinner
Performance3539Next.js
Accessibility9190Material UI
Best Practices8888Tie
SEO8894Next.js
Security6667Next.js
TTFB374ms301msNext.js
Composite7474Tie
Performance
Material UI
35
Next.js
39
Accessibility
Material UI
91
Next.js
90
Security
Material UI
66
Next.js
67
SEO
Material UI
88
Next.js
94
Composite
Material UI
74
Next.js
74

Next.js outperforms Material UI in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 74). Material UI leads in accessibility.

When to choose Material UI

Choose Material UI when your primary concern is accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Next.js

Choose Next.js when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 25 audited Material UI sites and 627 audited Next.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Material UI or Next.js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Next.js sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (39 vs 35 on average).
Which has better security, Material UI or Next.js?
Next.js sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Material UI or Next.js?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Material UI (91 vs 90). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Material UI or Next.js?
Next.js sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (94 vs 88 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Material UI or Next.js?
Next.js sites show lower Time to First Byte (301 ms vs 374 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Material UI or Next.js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Next.js scores higher on overall composite score while Material UI may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback