Based on 154 and 33 real audits
| Metric | Matomo Analytics | Matomo Tag Manager | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 52 | 48 | Matomo Analytics |
| Accessibility | 88 | 89 | Matomo Tag Manager |
| Best Practices | 89 | 90 | Matomo Tag Manager |
| SEO | 91 | 91 | Tie |
| Security | 67 | 67 | Tie |
| TTFB | 415ms | 320ms | Matomo Tag Manager |
| Composite | 74 | 75 | Matomo Tag Manager |
Matomo Tag Manager outperforms Matomo Analytics in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 74). Matomo Analytics leads in performance.
Choose Matomo Analytics when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Matomo Tag Manager when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 154 audited Matomo Analytics sites and 33 audited Matomo Tag Manager sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback