Skip to content

Matomo Analytics vs Microsoft

Based on 136 and 2444 real audits

View Matomo Analytics details | View Microsoft details
MetricMatomo AnalyticsMicrosoftWinner
Performance5239Matomo Analytics
Accessibility8889Microsoft
Best Practices8986Matomo Analytics
SEO9089Matomo Analytics
Security6567Microsoft
TTFB428ms329msMicrosoft
Composite7473Matomo Analytics
Performance
Matomo Analytics
52
Microsoft
39
Accessibility
Matomo Analytics
88
Microsoft
89
Security
Matomo Analytics
65
Microsoft
67
SEO
Matomo Analytics
90
Microsoft
89
Composite
Matomo Analytics
74
Microsoft
73

Matomo Analytics outperforms Microsoft in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Microsoft leads in accessibility, security, TTFB.

When to choose Matomo Analytics

Choose Matomo Analytics when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Microsoft

Choose Microsoft when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 136 audited Matomo Analytics sites and 2444 audited Microsoft sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Matomo Analytics or Microsoft?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Matomo Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (52 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, Matomo Analytics or Microsoft?
Microsoft sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Matomo Analytics or Microsoft?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Microsoft (89 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Matomo Analytics or Microsoft?
Matomo Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (90 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Matomo Analytics or Microsoft?
Microsoft sites show lower Time to First Byte (329 ms vs 428 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Matomo Analytics or Microsoft for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Matomo Analytics scores higher on overall composite score while Matomo Analytics may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback