Based on 134 and 3359 real audits
| Metric | Matomo Analytics | Open Graph | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 52 | 45 | Matomo Analytics |
| Accessibility | 88 | 89 | Open Graph |
| Best Practices | 89 | 87 | Matomo Analytics |
| SEO | 90 | 92 | Open Graph |
| Security | 65 | 66 | Open Graph |
| TTFB | 430ms | 358ms | Open Graph |
| Composite | 74 | 74 | Tie |
Open Graph outperforms Matomo Analytics in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 74). Matomo Analytics leads in performance, best practices.
Choose Matomo Analytics when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 134 audited Matomo Analytics sites and 3359 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback