Skip to content

Matomo Analytics vs PHP

Based on 134 and 1012 real audits

View Matomo Analytics details | View PHP details
MetricMatomo AnalyticsPHPWinner
Performance5246Matomo Analytics
Accessibility8889PHP
Best Practices8987Matomo Analytics
SEO9091PHP
Security6565Tie
TTFB430ms409msPHP
Composite7474Tie
Performance
Matomo Analytics
52
PHP
46
Accessibility
Matomo Analytics
88
PHP
89
Security
Matomo Analytics
65
PHP
65
SEO
Matomo Analytics
90
PHP
91
Composite
Matomo Analytics
74
PHP
74

PHP outperforms Matomo Analytics in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 74). Matomo Analytics leads in performance, best practices.

When to choose Matomo Analytics

Choose Matomo Analytics when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose PHP

Choose PHP when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 134 audited Matomo Analytics sites and 1012 audited PHP sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Matomo Analytics or PHP?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Matomo Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (52 vs 46 on average).
Which has better security, Matomo Analytics or PHP?
Matomo Analytics sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Matomo Analytics or PHP?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor PHP (89 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Matomo Analytics or PHP?
PHP sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Matomo Analytics or PHP?
PHP sites show lower Time to First Byte (409 ms vs 430 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Matomo Analytics or PHP for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Matomo Analytics scores higher on overall composite score while Matomo Analytics may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback