Skip to content

Matomo Analytics vs PHP

Based on 156 and 1204 real audits

View Matomo Analytics details | View PHP details
MetricMatomo AnalyticsPHPWinner
Performance5248Matomo Analytics
Accessibility8888Tie
Best Practices8988Matomo Analytics
SEO9191Tie
Security6767Tie
TTFB412ms468msMatomo Analytics
Composite7575Tie
Performance
Matomo Analytics
52
PHP
48
Accessibility
Matomo Analytics
88
PHP
88
Security
Matomo Analytics
67
PHP
67
SEO
Matomo Analytics
91
PHP
91
Composite
Matomo Analytics
75
PHP
75

Matomo Analytics outperforms PHP in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 75). PHP leads in no categories.

When to choose Matomo Analytics

Choose Matomo Analytics when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose PHP

PHP doesn't clearly lead Matomo Analytics in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 156 audited Matomo Analytics sites and 1204 audited PHP sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Matomo Analytics or PHP?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Matomo Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (52 vs 48 on average).
Which has better security, Matomo Analytics or PHP?
Matomo Analytics sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Matomo Analytics or PHP?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Matomo Analytics (88 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Matomo Analytics or PHP?
Matomo Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Matomo Analytics or PHP?
Matomo Analytics sites show lower Time to First Byte (412 ms vs 468 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Matomo Analytics or PHP for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Matomo Analytics scores higher on overall composite score while Matomo Analytics may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback