Skip to content

Matomo Analytics vs Site Search 360

Based on 131 and 1 real audits

View Matomo Analytics details | View Site Search 360 details
MetricMatomo AnalyticsSite Search 360Winner
Performance5254Site Search 360
Accessibility8871Matomo Analytics
Best Practices89100Site Search 360
SEO9085Matomo Analytics
Security6461Matomo Analytics
TTFB429ms166msSite Search 360
Composite7373Tie
Performance
Matomo Analytics
52
Site Search 360
54
Accessibility
Matomo Analytics
88
Site Search 360
71
Security
Matomo Analytics
64
Site Search 360
61
SEO
Matomo Analytics
90
Site Search 360
85
Composite
Matomo Analytics
73
Site Search 360
73

Matomo Analytics and Site Search 360 are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Matomo Analytics has a composite score of 73 while Site Search 360 scores 73.

When to choose Matomo Analytics

Choose Matomo Analytics when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Site Search 360

Choose Site Search 360 when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 131 audited Matomo Analytics sites and 1 audited Site Search 360 sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Matomo Analytics or Site Search 360?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Site Search 360 sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (54 vs 52 on average).
Which has better security, Matomo Analytics or Site Search 360?
Matomo Analytics sites score higher on security analysis (64 vs 61 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Matomo Analytics or Site Search 360?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Matomo Analytics (88 vs 71). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Matomo Analytics or Site Search 360?
Matomo Analytics sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (90 vs 85 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Matomo Analytics or Site Search 360?
Site Search 360 sites show lower Time to First Byte (166 ms vs 429 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Matomo Analytics or Site Search 360 for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Site Search 360 scores higher on overall composite score while Matomo Analytics may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback