Based on 136 and 2 real audits
| Metric | Matomo Analytics | Sitevision CMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 52 | 41 | Matomo Analytics |
| Accessibility | 88 | 100 | Sitevision CMS |
| Best Practices | 89 | 90 | Sitevision CMS |
| SEO | 90 | 95 | Sitevision CMS |
| Security | 65 | 64 | Matomo Analytics |
| TTFB | 428ms | 200ms | Sitevision CMS |
| Composite | 74 | 74 | Tie |
Sitevision CMS outperforms Matomo Analytics in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 74). Matomo Analytics leads in performance, security.
Choose Matomo Analytics when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Sitevision CMS when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 136 audited Matomo Analytics sites and 2 audited Sitevision CMS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback