Skip to content

Matomo Analytics vs Twenty Fifteen

Based on 136 and 1 real audits

View Matomo Analytics details | View Twenty Fifteen details
MetricMatomo AnalyticsTwenty FifteenWinner
Performance5261Twenty Fifteen
Accessibility8880Matomo Analytics
Best Practices8996Twenty Fifteen
SEO9092Twenty Fifteen
Security6562Matomo Analytics
TTFB428ms79msTwenty Fifteen
Composite7480Twenty Fifteen
Performance
Matomo Analytics
52
Twenty Fifteen
61
Accessibility
Matomo Analytics
88
Twenty Fifteen
80
Security
Matomo Analytics
65
Twenty Fifteen
62
SEO
Matomo Analytics
90
Twenty Fifteen
92
Composite
Matomo Analytics
74
Twenty Fifteen
80

Twenty Fifteen outperforms Matomo Analytics in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (80 vs 74). Matomo Analytics leads in accessibility, security.

When to choose Matomo Analytics

Choose Matomo Analytics when your primary concern is accessibility and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Twenty Fifteen

Choose Twenty Fifteen when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 136 audited Matomo Analytics sites and 1 audited Twenty Fifteen sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Matomo Analytics or Twenty Fifteen?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Twenty Fifteen sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (61 vs 52 on average).
Which has better security, Matomo Analytics or Twenty Fifteen?
Matomo Analytics sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 62 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Matomo Analytics or Twenty Fifteen?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Matomo Analytics (88 vs 80). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Matomo Analytics or Twenty Fifteen?
Twenty Fifteen sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Matomo Analytics or Twenty Fifteen?
Twenty Fifteen sites show lower Time to First Byte (79 ms vs 428 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Matomo Analytics or Twenty Fifteen for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Twenty Fifteen scores higher on overall composite score while Matomo Analytics may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback