Based on 174 and 39 real audits
| Metric | Matomo Analytics | TYPO3 CMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 52 | 58 | TYPO3 CMS |
| Accessibility | 89 | 94 | TYPO3 CMS |
| Best Practices | 90 | 95 | TYPO3 CMS |
| SEO | 91 | 92 | TYPO3 CMS |
| Security | 68 | 71 | TYPO3 CMS |
| TTFB | 486ms | 507ms | Matomo Analytics |
| Composite | 75 | 78 | TYPO3 CMS |
TYPO3 CMS outperforms Matomo Analytics in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 75). Matomo Analytics leads in TTFB.
Choose Matomo Analytics when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose TYPO3 CMS when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 174 audited Matomo Analytics sites and 39 audited TYPO3 CMS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback