| Metric | MaxMind | Next.js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 27 | 37 | Next.js |
| Accessibility | 91 | 90 | MaxMind |
| Best Practices | 84 | 88 | Next.js |
| SEO | 89 | 94 | Next.js |
| Security | 66 | 66 | Tie |
| TTFB | 100ms | 288ms | MaxMind |
| Composite | 74 | 73 | MaxMind |
MaxMind and Next.js are closely matched, each leading in different categories. MaxMind has a composite score of 74 while Next.js scores 73.
Choose MaxMind when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Next.js when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 3 audited MaxMind sites and 560 audited Next.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback