Skip to content

Microsoft Advertising vs Open Graph

Based on 240 and 3359 real audits

View Microsoft Advertising details | View Open Graph details
MetricMicrosoft AdvertisingOpen GraphWinner
Performance3245Open Graph
Accessibility8989Tie
Best Practices7987Open Graph
SEO9092Open Graph
Security6566Open Graph
TTFB317ms358msMicrosoft Advertising
Composite7274Open Graph
Performance
Microsoft Advertising
32
Open Graph
45
Accessibility
Microsoft Advertising
89
Open Graph
89
Security
Microsoft Advertising
65
Open Graph
66
SEO
Microsoft Advertising
90
Open Graph
92
Composite
Microsoft Advertising
72
Open Graph
74

Open Graph outperforms Microsoft Advertising in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). Microsoft Advertising leads in TTFB.

When to choose Microsoft Advertising

Choose Microsoft Advertising when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Open Graph

Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 240 audited Microsoft Advertising sites and 3359 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Microsoft Advertising or Open Graph?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Open Graph sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (45 vs 32 on average).
Which has better security, Microsoft Advertising or Open Graph?
Open Graph sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Microsoft Advertising or Open Graph?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Microsoft Advertising (89 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Microsoft Advertising or Open Graph?
Open Graph sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Microsoft Advertising or Open Graph?
Microsoft Advertising sites show lower Time to First Byte (317 ms vs 358 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Microsoft Advertising or Open Graph for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Open Graph scores higher on overall composite score while Microsoft Advertising may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback