Based on 72 and 79 real audits
| Metric | Microsoft IIS | Windows Server | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 45 | 51 | Windows Server |
| Accessibility | 87 | 88 | Windows Server |
| Best Practices | 85 | 87 | Windows Server |
| SEO | 90 | 92 | Windows Server |
| Security | 67 | 69 | Windows Server |
| TTFB | 547ms | 530ms | Windows Server |
| Composite | 72 | 74 | Windows Server |
Windows Server outperforms Microsoft IIS in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). Microsoft IIS leads in no categories.
Microsoft IIS doesn't clearly lead Windows Server in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Windows Server when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 72 audited Microsoft IIS sites and 79 audited Windows Server sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback