Skip to content

Microsoft vs Native app preferred

Based on 2412 and 118 real audits

View Microsoft details | View Native app preferred details
MetricMicrosoftNative app preferredWinner
Performance3937Microsoft
Accessibility8986Microsoft
Best Practices8686Tie
SEO8992Native app preferred
Security6666Tie
TTFB329ms302msNative app preferred
Composite7273Native app preferred
Performance
Microsoft
39
Native app preferred
37
Accessibility
Microsoft
89
Native app preferred
86
Security
Microsoft
66
Native app preferred
66
SEO
Microsoft
89
Native app preferred
92
Composite
Microsoft
72
Native app preferred
73

Native app preferred outperforms Microsoft in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). Microsoft leads in performance, accessibility.

When to choose Microsoft

Choose Microsoft when your primary concern is accessibility and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Native app preferred

Choose Native app preferred when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2412 audited Microsoft sites and 118 audited Native app preferred sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Microsoft or Native app preferred?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Microsoft sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (39 vs 37 on average).
Which has better security, Microsoft or Native app preferred?
Microsoft sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Microsoft or Native app preferred?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Microsoft (89 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Microsoft or Native app preferred?
Native app preferred sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Microsoft or Native app preferred?
Native app preferred sites show lower Time to First Byte (302 ms vs 329 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Microsoft or Native app preferred for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Microsoft scores higher on overall composite score while Microsoft may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback