Skip to content

Microsoft vs NS1

Based on 2477 and 163 real audits

View Microsoft details | View NS1 details
MetricMicrosoftNS1Winner
Performance3942NS1
Accessibility8991NS1
Best Practices8687NS1
SEO8989Tie
Security6767Tie
TTFB329ms194msNS1
Composite7373Tie
Performance
Microsoft
39
NS1
42
Accessibility
Microsoft
89
NS1
91
Security
Microsoft
67
NS1
67
SEO
Microsoft
89
NS1
89
Composite
Microsoft
73
NS1
73

NS1 outperforms Microsoft in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). Microsoft leads in no categories.

When to choose Microsoft

Microsoft doesn't clearly lead NS1 in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.

When to choose NS1

Choose NS1 when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2477 audited Microsoft sites and 163 audited NS1 sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Microsoft or NS1?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, NS1 sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (42 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, Microsoft or NS1?
Microsoft sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Microsoft or NS1?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor NS1 (91 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Microsoft or NS1?
Microsoft sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (89 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Microsoft or NS1?
NS1 sites show lower Time to First Byte (194 ms vs 329 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Microsoft or NS1 for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. NS1 scores higher on overall composite score while Microsoft may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback