Skip to content

Microsoft vs Open Graph

Based on 2465 and 3557 real audits

View Microsoft details | View Open Graph details
MetricMicrosoftOpen GraphWinner
Performance3946Open Graph
Accessibility8989Tie
Best Practices8688Open Graph
SEO8992Open Graph
Security6767Tie
TTFB329ms388msMicrosoft
Composite7375Open Graph
Performance
Microsoft
39
Open Graph
46
Accessibility
Microsoft
89
Open Graph
89
Security
Microsoft
67
Open Graph
67
SEO
Microsoft
89
Open Graph
92
Composite
Microsoft
73
Open Graph
75

Open Graph outperforms Microsoft in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). Microsoft leads in TTFB.

When to choose Microsoft

Choose Microsoft when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Open Graph

Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2465 audited Microsoft sites and 3557 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Microsoft or Open Graph?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Open Graph sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (46 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, Microsoft or Open Graph?
Microsoft sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Microsoft or Open Graph?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Microsoft (89 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Microsoft or Open Graph?
Open Graph sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Microsoft or Open Graph?
Microsoft sites show lower Time to First Byte (329 ms vs 388 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Microsoft or Open Graph for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Open Graph scores higher on overall composite score while Microsoft may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback