Skip to content

Microsoft vs PHP

Based on 2444 and 1061 real audits

View Microsoft details | View PHP details
MetricMicrosoftPHPWinner
Performance3947PHP
Accessibility8989Tie
Best Practices8688PHP
SEO8991PHP
Security6766Microsoft
TTFB329ms430msMicrosoft
Composite7374PHP
Performance
Microsoft
39
PHP
47
Accessibility
Microsoft
89
PHP
89
Security
Microsoft
67
PHP
66
SEO
Microsoft
89
PHP
91
Composite
Microsoft
73
PHP
74

PHP outperforms Microsoft in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Microsoft leads in security, TTFB.

When to choose Microsoft

Choose Microsoft when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose PHP

Choose PHP when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2444 audited Microsoft sites and 1061 audited PHP sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Microsoft or PHP?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, PHP sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (47 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, Microsoft or PHP?
Microsoft sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Microsoft or PHP?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Microsoft (89 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Microsoft or PHP?
PHP sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Microsoft or PHP?
Microsoft sites show lower Time to First Byte (329 ms vs 430 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Microsoft or PHP for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. PHP scores higher on overall composite score while Microsoft may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback