Skip to content

Microsoft vs PHP

Based on 2504 and 1203 real audits

View Microsoft details | View PHP details
MetricMicrosoftPHPWinner
Performance4048PHP
Accessibility8988Microsoft
Best Practices8688PHP
SEO8991PHP
Security6767Tie
TTFB330ms468msMicrosoft
Composite7375PHP
Performance
Microsoft
40
PHP
48
Accessibility
Microsoft
89
PHP
88
Security
Microsoft
67
PHP
67
SEO
Microsoft
89
PHP
91
Composite
Microsoft
73
PHP
75

PHP outperforms Microsoft in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). Microsoft leads in accessibility, TTFB.

When to choose Microsoft

Choose Microsoft when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose PHP

Choose PHP when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2504 audited Microsoft sites and 1203 audited PHP sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Microsoft or PHP?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, PHP sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (48 vs 40 on average).
Which has better security, Microsoft or PHP?
Microsoft sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Microsoft or PHP?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Microsoft (89 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Microsoft or PHP?
PHP sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Microsoft or PHP?
Microsoft sites show lower Time to First Byte (330 ms vs 468 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Microsoft or PHP for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. PHP scores higher on overall composite score while Microsoft may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback