Based on 2421 and 25 real audits
| Metric | Microsoft | Salesforce | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 39 | 31 | Microsoft |
| Accessibility | 89 | 88 | Microsoft |
| Best Practices | 86 | 84 | Microsoft |
| SEO | 89 | 88 | Microsoft |
| Security | 66 | 64 | Microsoft |
| TTFB | 329ms | 367ms | Microsoft |
| Composite | 72 | 71 | Microsoft |
Microsoft outperforms Salesforce in 7 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 71). Salesforce leads in no categories.
Choose Microsoft when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Salesforce doesn't clearly lead Microsoft in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 2421 audited Microsoft sites and 25 audited Salesforce sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback