Based on 2328 and 6 real audits
| Metric | Microsoft | Selectize | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 39 | 36 | Microsoft |
| Accessibility | 89 | 85 | Microsoft |
| Best Practices | 86 | 86 | Tie |
| SEO | 89 | 86 | Microsoft |
| Security | 66 | 65 | Microsoft |
| TTFB | 326ms | 292ms | Selectize |
| Composite | 72 | 73 | Selectize |
Microsoft outperforms Selectize in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 73). Selectize leads in TTFB, composite score.
Choose Microsoft when your primary concern is accessibility and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Selectize when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2328 audited Microsoft sites and 6 audited Selectize sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback