Skip to content

Microsoft vs ShareThis

Based on 2550 and 19 real audits

MetricMicrosoftShareThisWinner
Performance4034Microsoft
Accessibility8988Microsoft
Best Practices8686Tie
SEO8992ShareThis
Security6766Microsoft
TTFB336ms597msMicrosoft
Composite7373Tie
Performance
Microsoft
40
ShareThis
34
Accessibility
Microsoft
89
ShareThis
88
Security
Microsoft
67
ShareThis
66
SEO
Microsoft
89
ShareThis
92
Composite
Microsoft
73
ShareThis
73

Microsoft outperforms ShareThis in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). ShareThis leads in SEO.

When to choose Microsoft

Choose Microsoft when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose ShareThis

Choose ShareThis when your primary concern is SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2550 audited Microsoft sites and 19 audited ShareThis sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Microsoft or ShareThis?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Microsoft sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (40 vs 34 on average).
Which has better security, Microsoft or ShareThis?
Microsoft sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Microsoft or ShareThis?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Microsoft (89 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Microsoft or ShareThis?
ShareThis sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Microsoft or ShareThis?
Microsoft sites show lower Time to First Byte (336 ms vs 597 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Microsoft or ShareThis for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Microsoft scores higher on overall composite score while Microsoft may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback