Based on 2421 and 8 real audits
| Metric | Microsoft | Storyblok | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 39 | 43 | Storyblok |
| Accessibility | 89 | 91 | Storyblok |
| Best Practices | 86 | 92 | Storyblok |
| SEO | 89 | 94 | Storyblok |
| Security | 66 | 66 | Tie |
| TTFB | 329ms | 283ms | Storyblok |
| Composite | 72 | 75 | Storyblok |
Storyblok outperforms Microsoft in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 72). Microsoft leads in no categories.
Microsoft doesn't clearly lead Storyblok in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Storyblok when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 2421 audited Microsoft sites and 8 audited Storyblok sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback