Skip to content

Microsoft vs Tengine

Based on 2421 and 27 real audits

View Microsoft details | View Tengine details
MetricMicrosoftTengineWinner
Performance3943Tengine
Accessibility8965Microsoft
Best Practices8673Microsoft
SEO8980Microsoft
Security6663Microsoft
TTFB329ms974msMicrosoft
Composite7269Microsoft
Performance
Microsoft
39
Tengine
43
Accessibility
Microsoft
89
Tengine
65
Security
Microsoft
66
Tengine
63
SEO
Microsoft
89
Tengine
80
Composite
Microsoft
72
Tengine
69

Microsoft outperforms Tengine in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 69). Tengine leads in performance.

When to choose Microsoft

Choose Microsoft when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Tengine

Choose Tengine when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2421 audited Microsoft sites and 27 audited Tengine sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Microsoft or Tengine?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Tengine sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (43 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, Microsoft or Tengine?
Microsoft sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 63 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Microsoft or Tengine?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Microsoft (89 vs 65). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Microsoft or Tengine?
Microsoft sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (89 vs 80 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Microsoft or Tengine?
Microsoft sites show lower Time to First Byte (329 ms vs 974 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Microsoft or Tengine for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Tengine scores higher on overall composite score while Microsoft may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback