Skip to content

Microsoft vs WOW

Based on 2523 and 13 real audits

View Microsoft details | View WOW details
MetricMicrosoftWOWWinner
Performance4048WOW
Accessibility8985Microsoft
Best Practices8688WOW
SEO8992WOW
Security6768WOW
TTFB333ms371msMicrosoft
Composite7375WOW
Performance
Microsoft
40
WOW
48
Accessibility
Microsoft
89
WOW
85
Security
Microsoft
67
WOW
68
SEO
Microsoft
89
WOW
92
Composite
Microsoft
73
WOW
75

WOW outperforms Microsoft in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). Microsoft leads in accessibility, TTFB.

When to choose Microsoft

Choose Microsoft when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose WOW

Choose WOW when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2523 audited Microsoft sites and 13 audited WOW sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Microsoft or WOW?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, WOW sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (48 vs 40 on average).
Which has better security, Microsoft or WOW?
WOW sites score higher on security analysis (68 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Microsoft or WOW?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Microsoft (89 vs 85). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Microsoft or WOW?
WOW sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Microsoft or WOW?
Microsoft sites show lower Time to First Byte (333 ms vs 371 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Microsoft or WOW for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. WOW scores higher on overall composite score while Microsoft may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback