Skip to content

Mimecast vs Open Graph

Based on 148 and 4469 real audits

MetricMimecastOpen GraphWinner
Performance3849Open Graph
Accessibility8989Tie
Best Practices8789Open Graph
SEO8693Open Graph
Security6670Open Graph
TTFB263ms427msMimecast
Composite7377Open Graph
Performance
Mimecast
38
Open Graph
49
Accessibility
Mimecast
89
Open Graph
89
Security
Mimecast
66
Open Graph
70
SEO
Mimecast
86
Open Graph
93
Composite
Mimecast
73
Open Graph
77

Open Graph outperforms Mimecast in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 73). Mimecast leads in TTFB.

When to choose Mimecast

Choose Mimecast when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Open Graph

Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 148 audited Mimecast sites and 4469 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Mimecast or Open Graph?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Open Graph sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (49 vs 38 on average).
Which has better security, Mimecast or Open Graph?
Open Graph sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Mimecast or Open Graph?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Mimecast (89 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Mimecast or Open Graph?
Open Graph sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 86 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Mimecast or Open Graph?
Mimecast sites show lower Time to First Byte (263 ms vs 427 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Mimecast or Open Graph for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Open Graph scores higher on overall composite score while Mimecast may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback