Skip to content

mod_fastcgi vs OpenSSL

Based on 2 and 50 real audits

View mod_fastcgi details | View OpenSSL details
Metricmod_fastcgiOpenSSLWinner
Performance442OpenSSL
Accessibility8286OpenSSL
Best Practices9685mod_fastcgi
SEO7789OpenSSL
Security7765mod_fastcgi
TTFB1079ms542msOpenSSL
Composite7873mod_fastcgi
Performance
mod_fastcgi
4
OpenSSL
42
Accessibility
mod_fastcgi
82
OpenSSL
86
Security
mod_fastcgi
77
OpenSSL
65
SEO
mod_fastcgi
77
OpenSSL
89
Composite
mod_fastcgi
78
OpenSSL
73

OpenSSL outperforms mod_fastcgi in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 78). mod_fastcgi leads in best practices, security, composite score.

When to choose mod_fastcgi

Choose mod_fastcgi when your primary concern is security and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose OpenSSL

Choose OpenSSL when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 2 audited mod_fastcgi sites and 50 audited OpenSSL sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, mod_fastcgi or OpenSSL?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, OpenSSL sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (42 vs 4 on average).
Which has better security, mod_fastcgi or OpenSSL?
mod_fastcgi sites score higher on security analysis (77 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, mod_fastcgi or OpenSSL?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor OpenSSL (86 vs 82). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, mod_fastcgi or OpenSSL?
OpenSSL sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (89 vs 77 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), mod_fastcgi or OpenSSL?
OpenSSL sites show lower Time to First Byte (542 ms vs 1079 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose mod_fastcgi or OpenSSL for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. OpenSSL scores higher on overall composite score while mod_fastcgi may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback