Skip to content

Modern Image Formats vs Open Graph

Based on 9 and 3415 real audits

View Modern Image Formats details | View Open Graph details
MetricModern Image FormatsOpen GraphWinner
Performance5545Modern Image Formats
Accessibility9089Modern Image Formats
Best Practices8587Open Graph
SEO9192Open Graph
Security6866Modern Image Formats
TTFB416ms365msOpen Graph
Composite7674Modern Image Formats
Performance
Modern Image Formats
55
Open Graph
45
Accessibility
Modern Image Formats
90
Open Graph
89
Security
Modern Image Formats
68
Open Graph
66
SEO
Modern Image Formats
91
Open Graph
92
Composite
Modern Image Formats
76
Open Graph
74

Modern Image Formats outperforms Open Graph in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 74). Open Graph leads in best practices, SEO, TTFB.

When to choose Modern Image Formats

Choose Modern Image Formats when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Open Graph

Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 9 audited Modern Image Formats sites and 3415 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Modern Image Formats or Open Graph?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Modern Image Formats sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (55 vs 45 on average).
Which has better security, Modern Image Formats or Open Graph?
Modern Image Formats sites score higher on security analysis (68 vs 66 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Modern Image Formats or Open Graph?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Modern Image Formats (90 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Modern Image Formats or Open Graph?
Open Graph sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Modern Image Formats or Open Graph?
Open Graph sites show lower Time to First Byte (365 ms vs 416 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Modern Image Formats or Open Graph for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Modern Image Formats scores higher on overall composite score while Modern Image Formats may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback