Skip to content

Modern Image Formats vs Open Graph

Based on 12 and 4595 real audits

MetricModern Image FormatsOpen GraphWinner
Performance5150Modern Image Formats
Accessibility8889Open Graph
Best Practices8789Open Graph
SEO9293Open Graph
Security7071Open Graph
TTFB473ms434msOpen Graph
Composite7777Tie
Performance
Modern Image Formats
51
Open Graph
50
Accessibility
Modern Image Formats
88
Open Graph
89
Security
Modern Image Formats
70
Open Graph
71
SEO
Modern Image Formats
92
Open Graph
93
Composite
Modern Image Formats
77
Open Graph
77

Open Graph outperforms Modern Image Formats in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (77 vs 77). Modern Image Formats leads in performance.

When to choose Modern Image Formats

Choose Modern Image Formats when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Open Graph

Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 12 audited Modern Image Formats sites and 4595 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Modern Image Formats or Open Graph?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Modern Image Formats sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (51 vs 50 on average).
Which has better security, Modern Image Formats or Open Graph?
Open Graph sites score higher on security analysis (71 vs 70 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Modern Image Formats or Open Graph?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Open Graph (89 vs 88). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Modern Image Formats or Open Graph?
Open Graph sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Modern Image Formats or Open Graph?
Open Graph sites show lower Time to First Byte (434 ms vs 473 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Modern Image Formats or Open Graph for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Modern Image Formats scores higher on overall composite score while Modern Image Formats may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback