Based on 40 and 822 real audits
| Metric | MonsterInsights | MySQL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 50 | 50 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 88 | 88 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 92 | 89 | MonsterInsights |
| SEO | 94 | 92 | MonsterInsights |
| Security | 72 | 71 | MonsterInsights |
| TTFB | 484ms | 703ms | MonsterInsights |
| Composite | 80 | 77 | MonsterInsights |
MonsterInsights outperforms MySQL in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (80 vs 77). MySQL leads in no categories.
Choose MonsterInsights when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
MySQL doesn't clearly lead MonsterInsights in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 40 audited MonsterInsights sites and 822 audited MySQL sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback