Based on 17 and 868 real audits
| Metric | MonsterInsights | RSS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 44 | 48 | RSS |
| Accessibility | 87 | 88 | RSS |
| Best Practices | 83 | 88 | RSS |
| SEO | 89 | 91 | RSS |
| Security | 65 | 65 | Tie |
| TTFB | 340ms | 339ms | RSS |
| Composite | 75 | 74 | MonsterInsights |
RSS outperforms MonsterInsights in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 75). MonsterInsights leads in composite score.
MonsterInsights doesn't clearly lead RSS in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose RSS when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 17 audited MonsterInsights sites and 868 audited RSS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback