Skip to content

Morris.js vs Raphael

Based on 3 and 5 real audits

View Morris.js details | View Raphael details
MetricMorris.jsRaphaelWinner
Performance6666Tie
Accessibility6768Raphael
Best Practices9194Raphael
SEO9184Morris.js
Security7470Morris.js
TTFB407ms467msMorris.js
Composite7875Morris.js
Performance
Morris.js
66
Raphael
66
Accessibility
Morris.js
67
Raphael
68
Security
Morris.js
74
Raphael
70
SEO
Morris.js
91
Raphael
84
Composite
Morris.js
78
Raphael
75

Morris.js outperforms Raphael in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 75). Raphael leads in accessibility, best practices.

When to choose Morris.js

Choose Morris.js when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Raphael

Choose Raphael when your primary concern is best practices and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 3 audited Morris.js sites and 5 audited Raphael sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Morris.js or Raphael?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Morris.js sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (66 vs 66 on average).
Which has better security, Morris.js or Raphael?
Morris.js sites score higher on security analysis (74 vs 70 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Morris.js or Raphael?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Raphael (68 vs 67). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Morris.js or Raphael?
Morris.js sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 84 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Morris.js or Raphael?
Morris.js sites show lower Time to First Byte (407 ms vs 467 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Morris.js or Raphael for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Morris.js scores higher on overall composite score while Morris.js may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback